AS Media Blog
Thursday, 27 April 2017
Evaluations: Question 7
Looking back at my preliminary task what did I learn in
progression from it?
Before the preliminary task I had no real previous
experience with filming or editing, so the preliminary task was the first time
that I had a chance to do this, so in short I learnt how to film and edit from
the preliminary task.
The narrative for our preliminary task was thought out in 1 hour
meaning we didn’t know what the actors would say and we didn’t have time to
think through where we would film. Whereas, the main task, we had a while to
think of the narrative we even had time to update the narrative, we also had
months of time to research the genre and compare our ideas meaning we can have
the best chance possible. In the preliminary task I didn’t think to film from
multiple angles and multiple times meaning the actual scene looked really
scruffy. Whereas the main product is totally smooth as we filmed each shot from
3 different angles, we also waited 3 second before and after we were ready to
get as much clip to edit as possi
ble.
ble.
![]() |
Lighting in preliminary task |
![]() |
Lighting in main |
The quality of sound, I would say is our strongest point, in
our product we have a long news broadcast that we actual got Dominic McGuiness
from talk sport to voice act for, this was done in a professional studio meaning
the quality of sound is pristine. I think that I edited the sound very well
when it came down to it, the quality of sound in the preliminary task was a
very bad point for us, during the filming we had chairs screeching, the
dialogue was quiet and we had no music in the task what so ever. I managed to
include a sound bridge which is great for continuity. Also the music in my part
is a smooth rhythm classical tune that connotes he’s living a boring, alone
life but there’s a chance for happiness.
In conclusion, I am extremely happy with how our final
product turned out, I was actually worried that it would be a total disaster
but I feel I came through to create the best product with the potential I had,
I put 100% effort into the creation of my section, the only problems lie with
Alex’s section as he had problems filming on the day, with many poor shoots
meaning the time ran down and he had a dark set to film with.
Tuesday, 25 April 2017
Evaluations: Question 4
Who
would be the audience of your product?


We have a secondary audience that is the age of 25-40, this would be older people or parents taking the younger end of the main audience to go and watch it at the cinema, the main demographic could recommend the product to the older audience meaning the words spreads faster.
Evaluations: Question 2
2: How does your media product represent particular social
groups?

Another class that is represented is the
middle class, the protagonist is middle class in our product, this is to create
a binary opposition with the antagonist, the difference between rich-poor and
good-bad, this is also shown by the ability of the characters, shown through
the dual narrative that flicks between the two classes. Our opening sequence
contains a dual narrative. The dual-narrative shows the difference in class as
the protagonist wakes up and makes a brew then hears the news of the incident,
whereas at the same time the antagonist is pulling the victim out the car and
head butting him for speaking, also the soundtrack changes from a peaceful tune
to a more upbeat action track along. This shows the correlation of the middle
class compared with the negativity of the lower class.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)